Can MiMo V2.6 Flash MOPD run on Mac Studio M5 Ultra 96GB?
NO — Won’t fit
Q2_K · 4K context · formula estimate
What this means
The checked Q2_K build needs about 154.9GB, above this Mac's conservative 88GB working budget.
−66.9GB short
above the working budget
154.9GB
needed at Q2_K
Q2_K
quant selected
0GB
working headroom
needs 154.9 GBworking budget 88 GB · short 66.9 GB
Where the memory goes
| Component | Detail | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Model weights | Q2_K GGUF (126.2 GB) + mmap overhead | 132.5 |
| KV cache | 4K context window | 21.6 |
| Runtime | macOS inference app + compute buffers | 0.8 |
| Total needed | at Q2_K, 4K context | 154.9 |
| Working budget | 96 GB unified memory − conservative macOS reserve | 88 |
| Headroom | memory shortfall | −66.9 |
Pick your quant
| Quant | Download | Memory | Estimated speed | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2_K ★ | 126.2 GB | 154.9 GB | — | ✕ Won't fit |
| MXFP4 | 167.4 GB | 198.2 GB | — | ✕ Won't fit |
Other models on this Mac
MiMo V2.6 Flash MOPD on other Mac Studio M5 Ultra configurations
FAQ
Can the Mac Studio M5 Ultra · 96GB run MiMo V2.6 Flash MOPD?
Not with the quants currently tracked. The selected Q2_K build needs about 154.9GB, above the 88GB working budget.
Which MiMo V2.6 Flash MOPD quant should I use on this Mac?
None of the tracked quants fit this configuration safely. Choose a smaller model or a Mac with more unified memory.
Which app should I use for MiMo V2.6 Flash MOPD on this Mac?
Start with LM Studio. This page gives the complete point-and-click walkthrough.
Are these speeds measured on a Mac Studio M5 Ultra?
No. The range is a formula estimate based on memory bandwidth, model size, active parameters, cooling, and a 4K context. The app, backend, thermals, and prompt can change real performance.